Research Article
Research Article
New records of mammals of the Coffee Region, Central Andes of Colombia using citizen science
expand article infoSofía Terán-Sánchez, Alejandra Díaz-Arango, Héctor Fabio Arias-Monsalve, Héctor E. Ramírez-Chaves
‡ Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia
Open Access


The Coffee Region of Colombia is one of the most representative areas of the country due to its cultural appeal. 200 of the 528 mammal species in the country occur in this region. Pre-existing knowledge about the group in this region has been obtained through indirect and direct sampling methods. We present new records of mammals of the “Reserva Forestal Protectora Bosques de la Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas (CHEC)”, located in the Coffee Region, based on vouchered citizen science records. To accomplish this, we held training workshops on the relevance of information provided by non-invasive vouchers for mammal collections that include bone remains, hairs, skin and other signs that can be found incidentally in the field by park rangers and other staff of the Reserve. In addition, we included photographic and video records of mammals taken by park rangers before and after the training workshops. We added vouchers obtained by the park rangers to the biological collection of the Natural History Museum of the Universidad de Caldas (MHN-UCa). Using this method, we obtained records of 34 mammalian species belonging to 20 families and 11 orders. We highlight the obtention of museum preserved vouchers of the Northern Naked-tailed Armadillo, Cabassous centralis (Miller 1899), and the Cauca Slender Opossum, Marmosops caucae (Thomas 1900), that had limited samples in national collections or had not been previously collected in the study area. With this work, a contribution network with the CHEC reserve staff was established, promoting the inclusion of these agents in the development of scientific research, and showing the relevance of collaborative science in assisting with filling information gaps about medium and large mammals.


Andes, Colombia, conservation, Mammalia, non-invasive records, protected areas, tracks


Colombia is home to an impressive diversity of mammals with over 528 species (Ramírez-Chaves et al. 2019). Most knowledge on this biodiversity of mammals comes from information provided by natural history museums (e.g., Navarro et al. 2003; Solari et al. 2013; Castaño et al. 2017; Ramírez-Chaves et al. 2018). Despite the elevated number of mammal species of the country, there are still information gaps on different topics such as natural history, biogeography, ecology, anatomy, and systematics (see Andrade-Ponce et al. 2016, for information on some charismatic families within Carnivora).

For the Colombian Coffee Region (departments of Caldas, Risaralda, and Quindío), one of the most emblematic areas of the Andean Region of the country, 200 species of mammals have been reported, including bats (93 species), rodents (49 species), marsupials (14 species), rabbits (two species), and other medium and large mammals (Orjuela and Jiménez 2004; Sánchez et al. 2004; Perez-Torres and Cortes-Delgado 2009; Castaño Salazar 2012; Parra-Colorado et al. 2014; Garcés Restrepo et al. 2016; Castaño et al. 2017; Vásquez-Palacios et al. 2019). Some of these records were collected through interviews with the local communities and non-invasive techniques such as photographs, bones, fur, and other signs (Orjuela and Jiménez 2004; Parra-Colorado et al. 2014), and/or by using vouchers housed in local biological collections (Castaño et al. 2003; Sánchez et al. 2004; Castaño Salazar 2012; Marín et al. 2012; Escobar-Lasso and Guzmán-Hernández 2014; Mantilla-Meluk et al. 2014; Escobar-Lasso and Gil-Fernandez 2019). Some of the historical records of mammals in the Coffee Region include charismatic or endangered species such as the Jaguar, Panthera onca, in the Department of Caldas, the last report of which dates back to 1998 (Escobar-Lasso et al. 2014), the Mountain Tapir, Tapirus pinchaque, and the Neotropical Otter, Lontra longicaudis, which are listed as among the country’s threatened category (Castaño Salazar 2012).

Despite the importance of this biological information, the representation of medium and large mammals in collections and museums on a regional level is still scarce (Castaño-Ramírez and Ramírez-Chaves 2018), since, due to the low population densities of these species, scientific collection is not an option (Patterson 2002). In addition, the inventories of medium and large mammals in the Coffee Region are still incomplete, and it has been suggested that to fill the information gaps complementary sampling techniques should be used (Sánchez et al. 2004). To assist with filling these gaps, the use of citizen science, defined as the incorporation of non-professional scientists in projects that collect or analyze reliable information to be used by scientists for decision making (Haklay 2013; McKinley et al. 2017) is an alternative worth exploring. Citizen science is crucial to support data collection and even to monitor population changes over time, allowing researchers not only to get more complete data, but also to promote conservation by divulgating both the justification for, and the results of, the research (Bonney et al. 2009; Dickinson et al. 2012). To date, the implementation of citizen science data collection has proven to be a helpful way to perform conservation-related works (e.g., Sterrett et al. 2019; Yang et al. 2019; Earp and Liconti 2020; Bonnet-Leburn et al. 2020).

In Colombia, citizen science has provided valuable information for the study of rare mammal species (Gerstner et al. 2018; De Roux et al. 2019; Ramírez-Chaves et al. 2020a, b) especially in the Andean Region, which is considered a high global priority for biodiversity conservation (Myers 1998), and one of the most threatened regions of the country as it hosts most of the human population (Quintero-Gallego et al. 2018), and its economic activity relies on the industrial sector and extensive agriculture (Armenteras et al. 2003; Rodríguez Eraso et al. 2013). In these studies, however, the collection of physical vouchers by the local community that might be useful for other studies (e.g., taxonomy, systematics) was not considered, limiting the research scope only to distribution and conservation updates. Considering this, we present new records of mammals in three sites of a protected area placed in the departments of Caldas and Risaralda in the Coffee Region of the Central Andes of Colombia, based on vouchered (photographs and specimens found dead in the field) citizen science records.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study was carried out in the departments of Caldas and Risaralda, Colombia (Fig. 1), in three particular areas; two of them are connected in the upper part with the National Natural Park Los Nevados, that protects high Andean forest and sub-páramo ecosystems: (i) Reserva Forestal Protectora Bosques de la Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas (CHEC), (ii) conservation area of CHEC and (iii) Bosques de La Esmeralda. The Reserva Forestal Protectora Bosques de la CHEC (04°52"N, 75°24"W) is located in the jurisdiction of the municipalities of Manizales and Villamaría, Department of Caldas (Roncancio and Estévez 2007), with an extension of approximately 3,893 ha and an elevational range between 2,400 and 4,000 m. (Ramírez-Mejía and Sánchez 2015). The conservation area of the CHEC Los Alpes (04°48"N, 75°31"W), is situated in the jurisdiction of the municipality of Santa Rosa de Cabal, Department of Risaralda, Colombia, with an extension of 499.2 ha and an elevational range between 2,900 and 3,800 m. The Bosques de La Esmeralda (05°03"N, 75°44"W) is located close to the Cauca River in jurisdiction of the municipality of Chinchiná, Department of Caldas, with an extension of approximately 40 ha, and an elevational range between 825 and 1,025 m (Castaño-Villa et al. 2008; Sanín et al. 2014). All three areas are located on the western slope of the Central Cordillera of Colombia, and immersed in tropical rainforest, Andean forest, Andean high forest, sub-páramo and páramo life zones.

Figure 1. 

Study area in the Coffee Region, departments of Caldas and Risaralda, Central Andes of Colombia. Top: Political boundaries of the Departments of Caldas and Risaralda, Colombia. Bottom: Details of the Andean and inter-Andean landscape in both departments.

Data collection

To obtain citizen science records, we conducted three animal preservation training workshops between 2018 and 2019 for the CHEC conservation area rangers, CORPOCALDAS (Autonomous Regional Corporation) staff, and park rangers of Los Nevados National Natural Park. The workshops aimed to instruct them on the relevance of preservation of biological evidence (vouchers) for research studies. During the training sessions we stressed the proper handling of the samples (handling and maintenance of dead specimens), and the associated information to be collected with the specimen. An additional lecture took place in the facilities of the Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad de Caldas (MHN-UCa), where a total of 21 park rangers had the opportunity to visit the mammals’ collection and the preserved vouchers.

Biological samples and records

Citizen science vouchers (photographs and whole specimens or bone remains) were collected circumstantially by those in charge of all three study sites, and buffer zones. The samples found were handled with gloves and placed in plastic bags to be taken to the Natural History laboratory of the MHN-UCa where the preservation and identification took place. In the collection, the complete specimens were frozen, while the bone remains were washed and then dried in a dehydration oven. For the complete specimens, once the condition was evaluated, they were prepared as skin, skull and skeleton, or preserved in fluid 70% alcohol (Nagorsen and Peterson 1980), and tissue samples were preserved in 96% alcohol (Kilpatrick 2002) for future molecular studies. When possible, we took external standard measures used in the study of mammals (Nagorsen and Peterson 1980), and cranial measurements for identification (Cerqueira and Lemos 2000; Voss et al. 2004; Hayssen 2011; Voss 2011; Quiroga-Carmona and Molinari 2012; Marín et al. 2012). Furthermore, we obtained photo-vouchers and videos donated by local people and CHEC staff taken at the study area between 2014 and 2019 pre- and post-workshops. We used the photographs to complete the information on the mammal species of the study area, a technique that has been also implemented in other studies to obtain additional data on mammals from Colombia (Ramírez-Chaves et al. 2020a, 2020b; Torres-Martínez et al. 2020).


During 2018 and 2019 a total of 28 mammal vouchers (specimens) of 15 species, 14 genera and 11 families were recovered by the CHEC staff in the study area. The most recurrent type of sample was bone remains, followed by skulls and recent corpses (Table 1). Despite the quality of some of the samples, the diagnostic characters for specific identification were preserved.

The Cottontail Rabbit (Sylvilagus cf. salentus) and the Stump-tailed Porcupine (Coendou rufescens) presented the highest number of records with six and three, respectively. In addition, vouchers of four species of carnivores, two of marsupials, three of the Dwarf Red Brocket Deer (Mazama rufina), among others, were recovered (Table 1). Although the emphasis was on samples from medium and large sized mammals, we also obtained three samples of small mammals, two Colombian Small-eared Shrews (Cryptotis colombianus), and one Great Fruit-eating Bat (Artibeus lituratus).

Table 1.

Mammal species recorded at three private areas located on the western slope of the Central Cordillera of Colombia: Reserva Forestal Protectora CHEC (1), conservation area of CHEC Los Alpes (2) and Bosques de La Esmeralda (3). Species supported by vouchers obtained as donations through citizen science to the MHN-UCa include the number and the catalogue code. Previous vouchers include the number of specimens housed at the MHN-UCa-M before this study took place. The condition of the photographed specimens between 2014 and 2019 is reported.

Taxon Previous museum vouchers Sites New museum vouchers Photo-vouchers (2014–2019)
Didelphis marsupialis Linnaeus, 1758 22 1, 2, 3 1 (MHN-UCa-M 1924) 2 alive
Didelphis pernigra J.A. Allen, 1900 2 1 alive
Caluromys derbianus (Waterhouse, 1841) 2 1 alive
Marmosops caucae (Thomas, 1900) 6 1 1 MHN-UCa-M 1759
Cabassous centralis (Miller, 1899) 2 1 1 MHN-UCa-M 2091 1 alive
Dasypus novemcinctus Linnaeus, 1758 17 1, 3 2 MHN-UCa-M 2083–2084 3 alive, 2 corpses
Choloepus hoffmanni Peters, 1858 9 1, 2, 3 2 MHN-UCa-M 1927–1928 7 alive (including 1 cub), 1 hair remains
Tamandua mexicana (Saussure, 1860) 2 1 alive, 1 corpse
Cryptotis colombianus Woodman and Timm, 1993 67 1 2 MHN-UCa-M 1925–1926 2 corpses
Saccopteryx bilineata (Temminck, 1838) 3 1 alive
Artibeus lituratus (Olfers, 1818) 63 1 1 MHN-UCa-M 1930
Platyrrhinus cf. helleri (Peters, 1866) 3 1 alive
Glossophaga cf. soricina (Pallas, 1766) 2 1 alive
Eptesicus fuscus miradorensis H. Allen,1866 1 1 corpse
Leopardus tigrinus (Schreber, 1775) 3 1 cub alive
Leopardus wiedii (Schinz, 1821) 1 1 alive
Cerdocyon thous (Linnaeus, 1766) 10 1, 2, 3 1 MHN-UCa-M 1803 1 alive, 1 skull
Lontra longicaudis (Olfers, 1818) 3 4 alive
Eira barbara (Smith, 1842) 1, 3 2 alive
Mustela frenata (Lichtenstein, 1831) 1 1 alive
Nasua nasua (Linnaeus, 1766) 1, 2, 3 3 alive, 1 corpse
Nasuella olivacea (Gray, 1865) 7 1, 2 1 MHN-UCa-M 2033 5 alive (including 4 cubs), 2 bone and hair remains
Potos flavus (Schreber, 1774) 2, 3 4 alive
Procyon cancrivorus (Cuvier, 1728) 8 2 1 MHN-UCa-M 1929
Tapirus pinchaque (Roulin, 1829) 1 2 alive
Mazama rufina (Pucheran, 1851) 1 1 3 MHN-UCa-M 2032, MHN-UCa-M 2049, MHN-UCa-M 2777 1 alive
Aotus lemurinus (I. Geoffroy, 1843) 3 1 alive, 1 corpse
Alouatta seniculus Linnaeus, 1766 3 1 alive
Syntheosciurus granatensis (Humboldt, 1811) 1, 2 6 alive
Cuniculus taczanowskii (Stolzmann, 1865) 7 1 2 MHN-UCa-M 1931–1932 2 skulls
Cuniculus paca (Linnaeus, 1766) 12 1 1 MHN-UCa-M 2774
Coendou rufescens (Gray, 1865) 10 1, 2, 3 2 MHN-UCa-M 1933–1935 2 alive
Dasyprocta punctata Gray, 1842 3 1 alive
Sylvilagus cf. salentus (J.A. Allen, 1913) 7 1 6 MHN-UCa-M 1936–1941 1 alive, 1 bone remains

The months with the highest number of records were February and May 2018. The locality with the highest number of records was the Romeral II sector located in the town of Termales in the municipality of Villamaria, Caldas with eight records; followed by Gallinazo in Villamaria and El Chuzo in the municipality of Santa Rosa de Cabal, Risaralda with three records each.

From the analyses of photo-vouchers and videos, we obtained 80 records that allowed us to identify 30 species of 27 genera and 11 orders (Table 1). The photographs included samples such as bones, fur, road kill, and alive animals (Figs 2, 3). Unlike the physical vouchers, these records were obtained throughout the whole year. August and January were the months with the highest number of records while 2015 and 2016 were the years with the highest number. With all the information sources, the total list of mammals registered in the study area amounted to 34 species, belonging to 31 genera, 21 families, and eleven orders. According to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN 2020), the records included Endangered species such as the Mountain Tapir (Tapirus pinchaque), and three Vulnerable species, the Colombian Night Monkey (Aotus lemurinus), the Dwarf Red Brocket Deer (M. rufina), and the Oncilla (Leopardus tigrinus) (Table 1).

Figure 2. 

Alive specimens photographed by the local people between 2014 and 2016 in private areas located on the Central Cordillera of Colombia. None of the animals were kept captive. A. Caluromys derbianus. B. Didelphis pernigra, C. Dasypus novemcinctus, D. Choloepus hoffmanni, E. Glossophaga cf. soricina, F. Nasuella olivacea, G. Nasua nasua, H. Cerdocyon thous, I. Cub of Leopardus tigrinus, J. Potos flavus with scabies, K. Mazama rufina, L. Syntheosciurus granatensis, M. Dasyprocta punctata, N. Coendou rufescens, O. Sylvilagus cf. salentus.

Based on the records, we recognized several natural history interactions, such as the presence of juvenile individuals of Mountain Coati N. olivacea, Oncilla L. tigrinus (Fig. 2), and the Hoffmann’s Two-toed Sloth Choloepus hoffmanni (Fig. 3), photographed on July 3rd 2015, August 2nd 2016, and December 10th 2019, respectively, showing that reproductive periods are occurring throughout the year in the study area. With this information, we also documented the presence of sympatric coati species such as the South American Coati, Nasua nasua, and the Mountain Coati, Nasuella olivacea (Fig. 3), and the killing of Dwarf Brocket Deer (M. rufina) by either a domestic dog (one event) or by cougars (two events) (Fig. 4).

Figure 3. 

Alive specimens photographed by the local people between 2017 and 2019 in private areas located on the Central Cordillera of Colombia. A. Cabassous centralis, B. An adult female and a juvenile of Choloepus hoffmanni, C. Adult Choloepus hoffmanni, D. Tamandua mexicana, E. Eptesicus fuscus miradorensis, F. Leopardus wiedii, G. Eira barbara, H. Potos flavus, I. Tapirus pinchaque.

Figure 4. 

Signs of a Dwarf Red Brocket Deer (Mazama rufina) killed by a cougar (Puma concolor) in Bosques de la CHEC, Central Cordillera of Colombia, found on August 2nd, 2019 by H. Ramírez-Chaves. A. Mandible of the red brocket deer, B. Footprint of the cougar, C. Front leg of the deer. Deer’s remains were deposited in the mammal’s collection as MHN-UCa-M 2777.


Our results contribute to our knowledge of the distribution of different mammal species in the Coffee Region (including threatened species), and to the strengthening of biological collections. Although most of the species recorded had been previously confirmed for the Department of Caldas and Risaralda (Castaño Salazar 2012; Castaño et al. 2017), there were new records at a regional level. For example, a previous study conducted at the CHEC Natural Reserve based on camera-trapping (Ramírez-Mejía and Sánchez 2015) did not record the Common Opossum (Didelphis marsupialis), the Cauca Slender Opossum (M. caucae), the Hoffman's Two-toed Sloth (C. hoffmanni), the Crab-eating Raccoon (Procyon cancrivorus), and the Cottontail Rabbit (S. cf. salentus). For the latter, its presence had been recorded in the nearby Río Blanco reserve (namely Sylvilagus brasiliensis) but not at the CHEC Reserve (Ramírez-Mejía and Sánchez 2015). The vouchers obtained were also useful to explore the morphological characters of some taxa. For example, the specimen of M. caucae (MHN-UCa-M-1759), exhibited some characters that did not fit the re-description of the species (Díaz-N. et al. 2011; Díaz-Nieto and Voss 2016), such as the number of antebrachial vibrissae, with two instead of one. However, the specimen exhibited most of the diagnostic characters, such as the absence of cuspids on its upper incisors and the connections of the pads of the left hind foot (Díaz-N. et al. 2011). In addition, the record of M. caucae is the first confirmed for the study area, despite the species being previously recorded in the Department of Risaralda (Castaño et al. 2017).

Similarly, the two specimens of Cryptotis, MHN-UCa-M 1925-1926, mostly matched the characters of Cryptotis colombianus including small to medium size (head and body length: 61.72, 68.75 mm), short tail (33.11, 32.92 mm), length between third upper molars (6.42, 5.48 mm respectively). C. colombianus has been previously recorded for the municipalities of Manizales and Villamaría (Escobar-Lasso et al. 2013), and our records contribute towards showing the current presence of the species in the study area. For both M. caucae and C. colombianus, geographic variation should be explored using additional samples from other localities of Colombia. Furthermore, the addition of samples from some groups such as rabbits (Sylvilagus) is relevant due the fact that the skull of the holotype of S. salentus is broken (Ruedas et al. 2019) limiting taxonomic comparisons. The specimens of Sylvilagus collected in this study (MHN-UCa-M 1936–1941), match the characters of S. salentus and may help to clarify basic aspects of the genus taxonomy which has been studied recently for the Central Cordillera of Colombia (see Diersing and Wilson 2017; Ruedas et al. 2019). The presence of two coati species is also interesting due to that sympatry only recently being reported in Colombia (González-Maya et al. 2015), and Peru (Mena and Yagui 2019).

Similar strategies of collecting non-invasive information about mammals (e.g., interviews, and the search for tracks and signs), but ones that did not lead to the strengthening of biological collections, have been historically used to study medium and large mammals in Colombia (Guzmán-Lenis and Camargo-Sanabria 2004; Sánchez et al. 2004; García-Herrera et al. 2015; Alfaro and Quesada 2016). We recorded almost the same number of species previously identified in the study area using other sampling techniques; however, the sampling effort among our and previous studies, is not comparable. Based on these, we suggest that using citizen science to study the local fauna, as it has been applied to charismatic mammalian species (Gerstner et al. 2018), should be considered for long-term monitoring plans of the local biodiversity in the country. With all these records, to date a total of 37 mammal species (34 in the present study) have been recorded in Reserva Forestal Protectora Bosques de la CHEC and Los Alpes (Roncancio and Estévez 2007; Ramírez-Mejía and Sánchez 2015; Castaño et al. 2017). We expect a higher mammal diversity at La Esmeralda, especially for small mammals such as bats, rodents, and marsupials, due to the lowest elevational range.

Finally, the training workshops allowed for scientific dissemination and established contact networks with the park rangers of the reserve, and also enabled collaboration between academic institutions and local stakeholders. This also helps to fulfill our objective of avoiding discrediting or ignoring the assistance of those who are exposed daily to this information. Opening the doors of science to agents outside this field allows for the collection of information that could only be acquired with a high sampling effort (Bonney et al. 2009). In this way, we can contribute to the biodiversity knowledge without disturbing the environment, and to the collection of valuable information that can later be deposited in educational centers such as natural history museums. Instructing, connecting and socializing this type of work with the community will help to fill information gaps and increase the knowledge of poorly studied animal groups.


Communication with people living nearby the protected area (Bosques de la CHEC), and with local employees and park rangers in order to collect key information for mammalogical studies, showed positive results with 34 species reported for the study area. The vouchers obtained by using citizen science allowed us to compile data for a period of six years and to update the mammal list of the study area. Besides the relevance of citizen science records for distribution and conservation studies, the preservation of museum vouchers is recommended due to the relevance of these collections to address additional research questions including morphological and genetic variation, systematics and taxonomy, among others.


The Centro de Museos, Museo de History Natural, Universidad de Caldas and the Semillero de Investigación en Carnivoros (SIC), for the support during this study. The staff of the CHEC and Fundación Ecológica Cafetera for allowing the work inside the protected areas. STS and ADA appreciate Maria Alejandra Ramírez’s help in the laboratory with the management of the samples. Viviana Gonzalez, Felipe Suarez, Francisco Sánchez, and Ana Maria Leal-Zanchet provided useful comments in different stages of the manuscript. HERC thanks to The Rufford Small Grants (Grant 29491-2) project: “The status of some highly hunted endemic rodents and deer of Colombia”, the Vicerrectoría de Investigaciones y Posgrados, Universidad de Caldas (projects 0743919, 1374819 and 0277620), and “Apoyo a Grupos de Investigación” (2020).


  • Alfaro VC, Quesada FD (2016) Registro de mamíferos silvestres atropellados y hábitat asociados en el cantón de La Fortuna, San Carlos, Costa Rica. Biocenosis 30(1–2): 49–58.
  • Andrade-Ponce GP, Montaño-Salazar SM, Riveros-Loaiza LM, Ramírez-Chaves HE, Suárez-Castro AF (2016) State of knowledge and research priorities for Canidae, Mephitidae and Procyonidae (Mammalia: Carnivora) families in Colombia. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 40(156): 500–513.
  • Armenteras D, Gast F, Villareal H (2003) Andean forest fragmentation and the representativeness of protected natural areas in the eastern Andes, Colombia. Biological Conservation 113(2): 245–256.
  • Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV, Shirk J (2009) Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 59(11): 977–984.
  • Bonnet-Lebrun AS, Karamanlidis AA, de Gabriel Hernando M, Renner I, Gimenez O (2020) Identifying priority conservation areas for a recovering brown bear population in Greece using citizen science data. Animal Conservation 23(1): 83–93.
  • Castaño JH, Muñoz-Saba Y, Botero JE, Vélez JH (2003) Mamíferos del departamento de Caldas-Colombia. Biota Colombiana 4(2): 247–259.
  • Castaño JH, Torres DA, Rojas-Díaz V, Saavedra-Rodríguez CA, Pérez-Torres J (2017) Mamíferos del departamento de Risaralda, Colombia. Biota Colombiana 18(2): 239–254.
  • Castaño-Ramírez ND, Ramírez-Chaves HE (2018) Sistematización y estimación del índice de salud de la colección de mamíferos (Mammalia) del Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad de Caldas, Colombia. Boletín Científico, Centro de Museos. Museo de Historia Natural 22(2): 90–103.
  • Castaño Salazar JH (2012) Mamíferos de Caldas: Un análisis de vacíos de información. Boletín Científico, Centro de Museos. Museo de Historia Natural 16(2): 101–119.
  • Castaño-Villa GJ, Morales-Betancourt JA, Bedoya-Álvarez ML (2008) Aportes de una plantación forestal mixta a la conservación de la avifauna en el cañón del río Cauca, Colombia. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía 61(1): 4358–4365.
  • Cerqueira R, Lemos B (2000) Morphometric differentiation between Neotropical black-eared opossums, Didelphis marsupialis and D. aurita (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae). Mammalia 64(3): 319–328.
  • De Roux JMD, Noguera-Urbano EA, Ramírez-Chaves HE (2019) The vulnerable Colombian weasel Mustela felipei (Carnivora): New record from Colombia and a review of its distribution in protected areas. Therya 10(2): 207–210.
  • Díaz-N JF, Gómez-Laverde M, Sánchez-Giraldo C (2011) Rediscovery and redescription of Marmosops handleyi (Pine, 1981) (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae), the least known Andean Slender Mouse Opossum. Mastozoología Neotropical 18(1): 45–61.
  • Díaz-Nieto JF, Voss RS (2016) A Revision of the Didelphid Marsupial Genus Marmosops, Part 1. Species of the Subgenus Sciophanes. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2016(402): 1–70.
  • Dickinson JL, Shirk J, Bonter D, Bonney R, Crain RL, Martin J, Phillips T, Purcell K (2012) The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6): 291–297.
  • Diersing V, Wilson DE (2017) Systematic status of the rabbits Sylvilagus brasiliensis and S. sanctaemartae from northwestern South America with comparisons to Central American populations. Journal of Mammalogy 98(6): 1641–1656.
  • Earp HS, Liconti A (2020) Science for the future: the use of citizen science in marine research and conservation. In YOUMARES 9-The Oceans: Our Research, Our Future. Springer, Cham, 19 pp.
  • Escobar-Lasso S, Gil-Fernández M (2019) The highest elevation record of Mustela frenata (Carnivora: Mustelidae) and distribution in Caldas department, Andean region of Colombia. Mammalogy Notes 1(2): 7–9.
  • Escobar-Lasso S, Guzmán-Hernández CF (2014) El registro de mayor altitud del Hurón Mayor Galictis vittata, con notas sobre su presencia y conservación dentro del departamento de Caldas, en la región andina de Colombia. Therya 5(2): 567–574.
  • Escobar-Lasso S, Cerón-Cardona J, Castaño-Salazar J (2013) Los mamíferos de la cuenca del río Chinchiná, en la región andina de Colombia. Therya 4(1): 139–155.
  • Escobar-Lasso S, Cerón-Cardona J, Castaño-Salazar JH, Mendieta-Giraldo L, Ospina-Herrera O (2014) Los felinos silvestres del departamento de Caldas, en la región andina de Colombia: Composición, distribución y conservación. Therya 5(2): 575–588.
  • Garcés Retrepo MF, Cuéllar N, Giraldo A (2016) Diversidad de mamíferos en un área con relictos de bosque seco en el Magdalena Medio (Caldas, Colombia). Revista de Ciencias 20(2): 147–160.
  • García-Herrera LV, Ramírez-Fráncel LA, Flórez GR (2015) Mamíferos en relictos de bosque seco tropical del Tolima, Colombia. Mastozoología Neotropical 22(1): 11–21.
  • Gerstner BE, Kass JM, Kays R, Helgen KM, Anderson RP (2018) Revised distributional estimates for the recently discovered olinguito (Bassaricyon neblina), with comments on natural and taxonomic history. Journal of Mammalogy 99(2): 321–332.
  • González-Maya JF, Vela-Vargas IM, Jiménez-Alvarado JS, Hurtado-Moreno AP, Moreno C, Aconcha-Abril I, Zárrate-Charry DA (2015) First sympatric records of coatis (Nasuella olivacea and Nasua nasua; Carnivora: Procyonidae) from Colombia. Small Carnivore Conservation 52–53: 93–100.
  • Guzmán-Lenis A, Camargo-Sanabria Á (2004) Importancia de los rastros para la caracterización del uso de hábitat de mamíferos medianos y grandes en el bosque Los Mangos (Puerto López, Meta, Colombia). Acta Biologica Colombiana 9(1): 11–22.
  • Haklay M (2013) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In: Sui D, Elwood S, Goodchild M (Eds) Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge. Springer, Dordrecht, 105–122.
  • Kilpatrick CW (2002) Noncryogenic preservation of mammalian tissues for DNA extraction: An assessment of storage methods. Biochemical Genetics 40(1-2): 53–62.
  • Mantilla-Meluk H, Ramírez-Chaves HE, Jiménez-Ortega AM, Rodríguez-Posada ME (2014) Emballonurid bats from Colombia: Annotated checklist, distribution, and biogeography. Therya 5(1): 229–255.
  • Marín D, Ramírez-Chaves HE, Suárez-Castro AF (2012) Revisión cráneo-dentaria de Procyon (Carnivora: Procyonidae) en Colombia y Ecuador, con notas sobre su taxonomía y distribución. Mastozoología Neotropical 19(2): 163–178.
  • McKinley DC, Miller-Rushing AJ, Ballard HL, Bonney R, Brown H, Cook-Patton SC, Evans DM, French RA, Parrish JK, Phillips TB, Ryan SF, Shanley LA, Shirk JL, Stepenuck KF, Weltzin JF, Wiggins A, Boyle OD, Briggs RD, Chapin SF III, Hewitt DA, Preuss PW, Soukup MA (2017) Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation 208: 15–28.
  • Myers N (1998) Threatened Biotas: ‘Hotspots’ in Tropical Forests. The Environmentalist 8: 1–20.
  • Nagorsen DW, Peterson RL (1980) Mammal collectors’ manual: a guide for collecting, documenting, and preparing mammal specimens for scientific research. Series: Life sciences miscellaneous publications. Royal Ontario Museum. Alger Press, Toronto, 79 pp.
  • Navarro AG, Peterson AT, Nakazawa Y, Liebig-Fossas I (2003) Colecciones biológicas, modelaje de nichos ecológicos y los estudios de la biodiversidad. Una perspectiva latinoamericana de la biogeografía. In: Morrone J, Llorente Busquets J (Eds) Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, 115–122.
  • Orjuela OJ, Jiménez G (2004) Estudio de la abundancia relativa para mamíferos en diferentes tipos de coberturas y carretera, finca hacienda cristales, área Cerritos-La Virginia, municipio de Pereira. Universitas Scientiarium 9(Es 1): 87–96.
  • Parra-Colorado JW, Botero-Botero Á, Saavedra-Rodríguez CA (2014) Percepción y uso de mamíferos silvestres por comunidades campesinas andinas de Génova, Quindío, Colombia. Boletín Científico, Centro de Museos. Museo de Historia Natural 18(1): 78–93.
  • Patterson BD (2002) On the continuing need for scientific collecting of mammals. Mastozoología Neotropical 9(2): 253–262.
  • Pérez-Torres J, Cortés-Delgado N (2009) Murciélagos de la Reserva Natural La Montaña del Ocaso (Quindío, Colombia). Chiroptera Neotropical 15(1): 456–460.
  • Quintero-Gallego ME, Quintero-Angel M, Vila-Ortega JJ (2018) Exploring land use/land cover change and drivers in Andean mountains in Colombia: A case in rural Quindío. The Science of the Total Environment 634: 1288–1299.
  • Quiroga-Carmona M, Molinari J (2012) Description of a new shrew of the genus Cryptotis (Mammalia: Soricomorpha: Soricidae) from the Sierra de Aroa, an isolated mountain range in northwestern Venezuela, with remarks on biogeography and conservation. Zootaxa 3441(1): 1–20.
  • Ramírez-Chaves HE, Suárez Castro AF, Zurc D, Concha Osbahr DC, Trujillo A, Noguera Urbano EA, Pantoja Peña GE, Rodríguez Posada ME, González Maya JF, Pérez Torres J, Mantilla Meluk H, López Castañeda C, Velásquez Valencia A, Zárrate Charry D (2019) Mamíferos de Colombia. Version 1.4. Sociedad Colombiana de Mastozoología.
  • Ramírez-Chaves HE, Calderón-Capote MC, Suárez-Castro AF (2018) The genus Dasyprocta Illiger, 1811 (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Colombia. Mastozoología Neotropical 25(1): 139–149.
  • Ramírez-Chaves HE, Carantón-Ayala D, Morales-Martínez DM, Rosero E (2020a) Filling distribution gaps: First record of the Western Amazonian Dwarf Porcupine, Coendou ichillus Voss & Da Silva, 2001 (Mammalia, Rodentia), in the Napo Moist Forests ecoregion of Colombia. Check List 16(6): 1627–1631.
  • Ramírez-Chaves HE, Romero Ríos C, Henao-Osorio JJ, Franco Herrera JP, Ramírez-Padilla BR (2020b) Notes on the natural history of the Stump-tailed Porcupine, Coendou rufescens (Rodentia: Erethizontidae), in Colombia. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 15(4): 471–478.
  • Ramírez-Mejía A, Sánchez F (2015) Non-volant mammals in a protected area on the Central Andes of Colombia: New records for the Caldas department and the Chinchiná River basin. Check List 11: e112.
  • Ríos M (2005) Especies focales y prioritarias para el SIRAP Eje Cafetero. Fundación EcoAndina. Cali, Colombia.
  • Rodríguez Eraso N, Armenteras-Pascual D, Alumbreros JR (2013) Land use and land cover change in the Colombian Andes: Dynamics and future scenarios. Journal of Land Use Science 8(2): 154–174.
  • Rodríguez-Mahecha JV, Alberico M, Trujillo F, Jorgensen J (2006) Libro rojo de los mamíferos de Colombia. Conservación Internacional Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Roncancio N, Estévez J (2007) Evaluación del ensamblaje de murciélagos en áreas sometidas a regeneración natural ya restauración por medio de plantaciones de aliso. Boletín Científico, Centro de Museos. Museo de Historia Natural 11: 131–143.
  • Ruedas LA, Silva SM, French JH, Platt Jr RN, Salazar-Bravo J, Mora JM, Thompson CW (2019) Taxonomy of the Sylvilagus brasiliensis complex in Central and South America (Lagomorpha: Leporidae). Journal of Mammalogy 100(5): 1599–1630.
  • Sánchez F, Sánchez-Palomino P, Cadena A (2004) Inventario de mamíferos en un bosque de los Andes centrales de Colombia. Caldasia 26(1): 291–309.
  • Sánchez F, Sánchez-Palomino P, Cadena A (2008) Species richness and indices of abundance of medium-sized mammals in Andean forest and reforestations with Andean alder: A preliminary analysis. Caldasia 30(1): 197–208.
  • Sanín D, Sierra-Giraldo JA, Posada-Herrera JM, Ramírez J (2014) Inventario florístico de los Bosques de La Esmeralda, margen del río Cauca (Chinchiná, Caldas, Colombia). Boletín Científico, Centro de Museos. Museo de Historia Natural 18(1): 17–45.
  • Solari S, Muñoz-Saba Y, Rodríguez-Mahecha JV, Defler TR, Ramírez-Chaves HE, Trujillo F (2013) Riqueza, endemismo y conservación de los mamíferos de Colombia. Mastozoología Neotropical 20(2): 301–365.
  • Sterrett SC, Katz RA, Fields WR, Campbell Grant EH (2019) The contribution of road-based citizen science to the conservation of pond-breeding amphibians. Journal of Applied Ecology 56(4): 988–995.
  • Suárez-Castro AF, Ramírez-Chaves HE (2015) Los carnívoros terrestres y semiacuáticos continentales de Colombia. Guía de campo. Editorial Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, 224 pp.
  • Torres-Martínez M, Ramírez-Chaves H, Noguera-Urbano E, Passos F (2020) Assessment of the rarity and conservation status of the Colombian endemic brown hairy dwarf porcupine Coendou vestitus. Oryx: 1–6.
  • Vásquez Palacios S, Chica-Galvis CA, Mantilla-Meluk H, Díaz-Giraldo V, Botero-Zuluaga M, Montilla S (2019) Mamíferos en áreas de conservación de la Corporación Autónoma Regional del Quindío, Colombia. Biota Colombiana 20(2): 93–104.
  • Voss RS (2011) Revisionary notes on Neotropical porcupines (Rodentia: Erethizontidae). 3. An annotated checklist of the species of Coendou Lacépède, 1799. American Museum Novitates 3720(3720): 1–36.
  • Yang D, Wan HY, Huang TK, Liu J (2019) The role of citizen science in conservation under the telecoupling framework. Sustainability 11(4): 1108.