Review Article |
Corresponding author: José Paulo Santana ( psantanasanto@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Ana Maria Leal-Zanchet
© 2020 José Paulo Santana, Patrício Adriano da Rocha, Eduardo Vinícius da Silva Oliveira, Ana Paula Nascimento Prata, Adauto Souza Ribeiro.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Santana JP, Rocha PA, Oliveira EVS, Prata APN, Ribeiro AS (2020) Phytosociology of the shrub-arboreal stratum of the Ibura National Forest, Northeastern Brazil: are 35 years sufficient to promote the regeneration of a forest fragment? Neotropical Biology and Conservation 15(2): 89-106. https://doi.org/10.3897/neotropical.15.e49114
|
Among the various applications of phytosociology, the evaluation of natural regeneration is of great importance, mainly because it provides insights for ecological restoration. The objective of this study was to analyze the composition and phytosociological parameters of shrub and tree vegetation in areas of plantation of eucalyptus (Corymbia citriodora) and areas of native forest in the Ibura National Forest, located in the Sergipe state of northeastern Brazil. For this purpose, 20 plots were sampled and all individuals with a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 8 cm were measured. Sampling revealed 821 individuals in the forest area and 1,000 in the eucalyptus area. These individuals represent 84 species and the areas presented a significant difference in species composition, with 61 in the eucalyptus area and 65 in the Forest area, and only 40 species were common to both areas. There was a predominance of pioneer individuals in the eucalyptus area. There also was a significant difference in basal area, relative density and relative dominance, but no significant differences were observed in average height. It was concluded that a period of 35 years is insufficient for the recovery of the eucalyptus area, which remains in a more initial successional stage than the forest area.
Entre as várias aplicações da fitossociologia, a avaliação da regeneração natural possui grande importância, principalmente porque fornece subsídios para restauração ecológica. Diante disso, este trabalho foi realizado com o objetivo de analisar a composição e os parâmetros fitossociológicos da vegetação arbustivo-arbórea em áreas de plantio de eucalipto (Corymbia citriodora) e de mata nativa na Floresta Nacional do Ibura, no estado de Sergipe. Para esta finalidade, foram demarcadas 20 parcelas e amostrados todos os indivíduos com diâmetro à altura do peito (DAP) ≥ 8 cm. A amostragem revelou 821 indivíduos na área de mata e 1.000 para a área de eucalipto. Esses indivíduos representam 84 espécies e as áreas apresentaram diferença significativa na composição de espécies, sendo 61 na área de eucalipto e 65 na área de floresta, e apenas 40 comuns a ambas as áreas. Observamos o predomínio de indivíduos de espécies pioneiras na área de eucalipto. Também encontramos diferença significativa para a área basal, densidade relativa e dominância relativa, mas não foram observadas diferenças significativas quanto à altura média. Conclui-se que o período de 35 anos não foi suficiente para a recuperação da área de eucalipto, a qual ainda se encontra em estágio sucessional mais inicial que a área de mata.
Alantic Forest, dispersion syndrome, ecological groups, eucalyptus settlements, sub-forest
Floresta Atlântica, Grupos ecológicos, Povoamentos de Eucalipto, Síndromes de dispersão, Sub-bosquet
Phytosociological studies are fundamental to analyze the structure and composition of plant communities, allowing a better understanding of the relationships between plants. In these studies, it is also possible to evaluate the distribution pattern, the importance and the ecological groups of the species in order to identify the successional stage of the community, which in turn can be indicative of conservation status (
Many authors emphasize the importance and necessity of studying the many applications of phytosociology in the evaluation of natural regeneration. This evaluation assumes great importance given the necessity of information on the restoration of native vegetation, particularly for the sub-forest of exotic-homogeneous settlements and of fast growth such as eucalypt (
Although abandoned eucalyptus plantations may have good recolonization rates, it is important to understand which native species are critical to recovering these degraded sites. Further studies are needed to investigate the real contribution of native species to the natural regeneration of these sites. For instance, not all native species can colonize areas containing eucalyptus, because Corymbia citriodora generates changes in natural habitat conditions, and thus may cause limiting barriers to the establishment of native species, such as: i) the high frequency of light that inhibits arrival of secondary species; ii) the allelopathic effect of C. citriodora; and iii) the desertification caused by deforestation (
Little is known about how many areas can be permeable to the arrival of species and how long it takes for their structural recovery. However, some authors indicate that the success of the rapid recovery of the natural vegetation in these eucalyptus sub-forest areas has been associated with the proximity of a source of propagules and the maintenance of the seed bank (
Most of the studies on natural regeneration in the sub-forest of homogeneous exotic plantations are concentrated in the southeastern region of Brazil, especially in the states of Minas Gerais and São Paulo (
In Sergipe, the cultivation of Corymbia citriodora is attracted by the increased demand; it presents good profitable results derived from the varied uses of the plant (
Among the conservation units in Sergipe lacking in phytosociological studies, is the National Forest (FLONA) of Ibura; it has a history of disturbance, being partially deforested for eucalypt plantation of the exotic species Corymbia citriodora and remained unchanged. After 35 years of abandonment of this area of C. citriodora and its subsequent secondary succession, it is necessary to evaluate its current state of regeneration. For that, we will use a preserved area as a basis to illustrate how far the degraded area is from restoration. This information will be fundamental for the evaluation of the development of the sub-forest in the presence of C. citriodora, contributing to the gaps in recolonization of natural forest areas, which have been cleared for cultivation of exotic species.
Considering the above, the objective of this study was to compare the composition and structure of two forest fragments, one in a managed area (C. citriodora planting) and another in an unmanaged area to understand the effect of management on natural regeneration, in the Ibura FLONA, in the state of Sergipe, in northeastern Brazil. Finally, we compared the results obtained between the two areas to evaluate if 35 years was sufficient to promote the recomposition of the forest structure (species composition, stratification and proportion of dispersion syndromes and ecological groups) in a similar way as the native forest.
The study area is located in the municipality of Nossa Senhora do Socorro, in the state of Sergipe, northeastern Brazil. The Ibura FLONA (37°08'03"W, 10°50'19"S) is located in the sub-catchment area of the Cotinguiba River, on BR-101, occupying an area of 144 ha. The vegetation of this FLONA is classified as semidecidual forest (Atlantic Rainforest domain), in moderate and advanced stages of regeneration, associated with small patches of mangroves (Fig.
In general, the vegetation of the Ibura National Forest is composed of two large sets of formation types: a preserved forest area and an area under regeneration. The preserved forest area shows a dense canopy in an advanced state of succession when compared to other subareas and has an extension of approximately 55.52 ha (38% of the total). The area under regeneration has an understorey in secondary succession mixed with old plantations of C. citriodora, the management of which stopped only 35 years ago. This area has an extension of 20.28 ha (20% of the total) and a history of anthropic pressure (
This Ibura FLONA also conserves 328 species of vascular plants, with 79 new occurrences for the state and the presence of Catasetum uncatum (Orchidaceae) in the category of “near threatened” and Zanthoxylum unifoliolatum, a recently described species in this genus (
The following two sites were selected for the phytosociological survey: (i) preserved forest and (ii) forest in regeneration under stands of Corymbia citriodora. In total, 20 plots were demarcated, of which ten were distributed in each area, fixed with a size of 400 m2 (20 × 20 m) totaling 8,000 m2. The plots were distributed with distances between them of 50 m between the forest units and 35 m between these units of the eucalyptus area. All individuals with a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 8 cm present in the plots were marked. Each of these individuals had their DBH and height measured (
Species identification was performed considering the material deposited in the herbarium ASE (Federal University Sergipe) after the floristic study conducted at Ibura FLONA by
The successional stage of the studied areas was defined using a subjective criterion to classify species and individuals in ecological groups, according to the model suggested by
Classical phytosociological parameters were estimated only for living individuals, such as relative density, relative frequency, dominance, absolute dominance (total basal area), and the importance value index (IV). The parameters related to the vertical structure were also evaluated and the Shannon-Wiener diversity index and the Pielou equability (
In total, 1,783 individuals were sampled of which 804 were in the Forest area and 979 were in the eucalyptus area. The values of abundance between the plots of the forest area and eucalypt were significantly different (t = -2.6768; p<0.05). There were 102 dead individuals distributed between the two areas, with most of the deaths recorded (66 individuals) in the forest area. There were 84 species of living organisms from 67 genera. The areas showed a significant difference in the species richness (w = 87.5, p < 0.01), with 61 in the eucalyptus area and 65 in the Forest area; only 40 species were common to both areas (Table
List of living individuals by order of IV of the forest area, recorded in the phytosociological study of the shrub-arboreal stratum of the Ibura National Forest, Nossa Senhora do Socorro, Sergipe, northeastern Brazil. Legends: *= new occurrences in Sergipe (
Species | EG | Native Forest | Ab | DR | FR | DoR | IV | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regeneration | Native Forest | Regeneration | Native Forest | Regeneration | Native Forest | Regeneration | Native Forest | Regeneration | |||
Allophylus edulis (A. St.-Hil.. Cambess. & A. Juss.) Radlk. | PI | 72 | 123 | 8.77 | 12.28 | 3.67 | 5.07 | 8.53 | 4.81 | 6.99 | 7.39 |
Tapirira guianensis Aubl. | PI | 24 | 121 | 2.92 | 12.08 | 3.67 | 4.56 | 13.25 | 6.04 | 6.61 | 7.56 |
Byrsonima sericea DC. | PI | 42 | 71 | 5.11 | 7.09 | 3.67 | 4.56 | 10.45 | 6.01 | 6.41 | 5.89 |
Cupania impressinervia Acev.-Rodr. | IS | 59 | 34 | 7.18 | 3.39 | 4.08 | 4.06 | 4.06 | 1.66 | 5.11 | 3.04 |
Chomelia obtusa Cham. &Schltdl. | PI | 68 | 111 | 8.28 | 11.08 | 4.08 | 5.07 | 1.54 | 2.21 | 4.63 | 6.12 |
Cupania oblongifolia Mart.* | IS | 37 | 12 | 4.50 | 1.19 | 4.08 | 3.55 | 2.42 | 0.45 | 3.67 | 1.73 |
Myrcia splendens (Sw.) DC. | IS | 48 | 10 | 5.84 | 0.99 | 2.04 | 1.52 | 1.49 | 0.16 | 3.12 | 0.89 |
Casearia javitensis Kunth | IS | 36 | 38 | 4.38 | 3.79 | 2.85 | 3.55 | 1.45 | 0.85 | 2.89 | 2.73 |
Eugenia punicifolia Kunth. | IS | 20 | 1 | 2.43 | 0.10 | 2.85 | 0.50 | 2.95 | 0.01 | 2.74 | 0.20 |
Campomanesia aromatic (Aubl.) Griseb. | IS | 25 | 20 | 3.04 | 1.99 | 2.44 | 4.06 | 2.49 | 1.34 | 2.66 | 2.46 |
Genipa americana L. | PI | 31 | 189 | 3.77 | 18.88 | 2.04 | 5.07 | 1.98 | 8.80 | 2.60 | 10.92 |
Protium heptaphyllum (Aublet) Marchand | IS | 29 | 5 | 3.53 | 0.50 | 2.44 | 1.52 | 1.56 | 0.26 | 2.51 | 0.76 |
Campomanesia ilhoensis Mattos | IS | 32 | 3 | 3.89 | 0.30 | 2.04 | 1.01 | 1.41 | 0.12 | 2.45 | 0.47 |
Miconia albicans (Sw.) Triana | IS | 23 | 35 | 2.80 | 3.49 | 3.67 | 3.04 | 0.84 | 0.59 | 2.44 | 2.38 |
Randia armata (Sw.) DC. | IS | 25 | 19 | 3.04 | 1.89 | 2.85 | 3.04 | 1.35 | 0.42 | 2.41 | 1.78 |
Eschweilera ovata (Cambess.) Miers. | LS | 17 | 2 | 2.07 | 0.20 | 2.04 | 1.01 | 2.74 | 0.03 | 2.28 | 0.41 |
Paubrasilia echinata (Lam.) E. Gagnon. H. C. Lima & G. P. Lewis.* | LS | 9 | 0 | 1.09 | 0.81 | 0 | 4.79 | 0 | 2.23 | 0 | |
Ocotea glomerata (Nees) Mez | LS | 21 | 2 | 2.55 | 0.20 | 2.85 | 1.01 | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2.08 | 0.42 |
Schefflera morototoni (Aubl.) Maguire. Steyerm. & Frodin | PI | 19 | 37 | 2.31 | 3.69 | 2.04 | 4.06 | 1.81 | 1.15 | 2.05 | 2.96 |
Sorocea hilarii Gaudich.* | IS | 11 | 3 | 1.34 | 0.30 | 2.04 | 1.52 | 2.60 | 0.03 | 1.99 | 0.61 |
Cassia grandis L. f. | LS | 9 | 0 | 1.09 | 0.81 | 0 | 3.12 | 0 | 1.68 | 0 | |
Campomanesia dichotoma (O.Berg) Mattos | LS | 13 | 1 | 1.58 | 0.10 | 2.44 | 0.50 | 0.94 | 0.008 | 1.65 | 0.20 |
Machaerium hirtum (Vell.) Stellfeld | IS | 7 | 7 | 0.85 | 0.69 | 1.63 | 0.50 | 1.93 | 0.60 | 1.47 | 0.60 |
Cecropia pachystachya Trécul | PI | 5 | 13 | 0.60 | 1.29 | 1.63 | 2.53 | 2.10 | 3.13 | 1.44 | 2.32 |
Psidium decussatum DC. | IS | 11 | 0 | 1.34 | 0 | 2.04 | 0 | 0.72 | 0 | 1.36 | 0 |
Chomelia pubescens Cham. & Schltdl* | IS | 10 | 0 | 1.21 | 0 | 2.04 | 0 | 0.67 | 0 | 1.31 | 0 |
Sparattanthelium batocudorum Mart. | IS | 8 | 9 | 0.97 | 0.89 | 2.04 | 3.04 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 1.10 | 1.36 |
Hymenaea courbaril L. | PI | 2 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.81 | 0 | 2.13 | 0 | 1.06 | 0 |
Eugenia brejoensis Mazine | LS | 9 | 0 | 1.09 | 0 | 1.22 | 0 | 0.57 | 0 | 0.96 | 0 |
Libidibia férrea (Mart. exTul.) L.P.Queiroz | LS | 4 | 0 | 0.48 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 1.96 | 0 | 0.95 | 0 |
Inga capitata Desv. | IS | 6 | 0 | 0.73 | 0 | 1.63 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.83 | 0 |
Eugenia sp. | NC | 4 | 0 | 0.48 | 0 | 1.63 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 0.80 | 0 |
Schoepfia brasiliensis A.DC. | IS | 7 | 3 | 0.85 | 0.300 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.77 | 0.47 |
Eugenia candolleana DC. | IS | 6 | 1 | 0.73 | 0.100 | 1.22 | 0.50 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.75 | 0.21 |
Psidium oligospermum Mart. ex DC. | NC | 4 | 0 | 0.48 | 0.000 | 1.63 | 0 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.72 | 0 |
Undetermined | NC | 4 | 1 | 0.48 | 0.100 | 1.22 | 0.50 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 0.69 | 0.20 |
Licania rigida Benth.* | PI | 2 | 4 | 0.24 | 0.400 | 0.81 | 1.52 | 1.00 | 0.11 | 0.68 | 0.67 |
Brosimum guianense (Aubl.) Huber | LS | 3 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 0.81 | 0 | 0.87 | 0 | 0.68 | 0 |
Cordia taguahyensis Vell. | IS | 3 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 1.22 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 0.56 | 0 |
Cordia toqueve Aubl. | LS | 2 | 9 | 0.24 | 0.899 | 0.81 | 1.52 | 0.46 | 0.64 | 0.50 | 1.02 |
Vitex rufescens A.Juss. | LS | 2 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.81 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 |
Apeiba tibourbou Aubl. | PI | 2 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.100 | 0.81 | 0.50 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.41 | 0.27 |
Annona montana Macfad. | IS | 2 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.81 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 |
Bauhinia sp. | IS | 2 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.81 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 0.38 | 0 |
Diospyru sinconstans Jacq.* | IS | 2 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.81 | 0 | 0.07 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 |
Swartzia acutifolia Vogel* | LS | 2 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 |
Psidium oligospermum Mart. ex DC. | LS | 2 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.81 | 0 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 |
Tabernaemontana sp. | NC | 2 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.100 | 0.81 | 0.50 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.37 | 0.25 |
Mangifera indica L. | LS | 2 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.100 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.32 |
Fabaceae sp. 1 | LS | 1 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.53 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 |
Fabaceae sp. 2 | NC | 1 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.28 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 |
Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth. | LS | 1 | 6 | 0.12 | 0.599 | 0.40 | 2.03 | 0.25 | 1.41 | 0.26 | 1.34 |
Swartzia dipétala Willd. Ex Vogel* | LS | 1 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 |
Casearia sylvestris Sw. | IS | 2 | 13 | 0.24 | 1.299 | 0.40 | 2.03 | 0.06 | 0.43 | 0.23 | 1.25 |
Myrcia tomentosa (Aubl.) DC. | IS | 2 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.100 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.20 |
Allophylus racemosus Sw.* | IS | 2 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 |
Fabaceae sp. 2 | NC | 1 | 4 | 0.12 | 0.400 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.13 | 0.73 | 0.22 | 0.54 |
Vismia guianensis (Aubl.) Pers. | PI | 1 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 |
Ziziphus joazeiro Mart. | IS | 1 | 6 | 0.12 | 0.599 | 0.40 | 1.52 | 0.03 | 0.35 | 0.18 | 0.82 |
Cynophalla flexuosa (L.) J. Presl | IS | 1 | 5 | 0.12 | 0.500 | 0.40 | 1.01 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.57 |
Clusia nemorosa G.Mey. | LS | 1 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 |
Myrcia sp. 1 | LS | 1 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.100 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 0.007 | 0.18 | 0.20 |
Actinostemon verticillatus (Klotsch) Baill | LS | 1 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 |
Myrciaria sp. 1 | LS | 1 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.100 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.009 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
Eugenia schottiana O. Berg | IS | 1 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.100 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.009 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.23 |
Adenanthera pavonina L. | LS | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.21 |
Anadenanthera peregrina (L.) Speg. | LS | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.200 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 2.54 | 0 | 1.08 |
Clitoria fairchildiana R.A. Howard | PI | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1.099 | 0 | 1.52 | 0 | 5.03 | 0 | 2.55 |
Didymopanax sp. | IS | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.20 |
Entrolobium sp. | NC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.41 | 0 | 0.34 |
Erythroxylum citrifolium A. St. – Hil | IS | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.200 | 0 | 1.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.41 |
Corymbia citriodora (Hook.) K.D.Hill & L.A.S.Johnson | NC | 0 | 16 | 0 | 1.598 | 0 | 3.55 | 0 | 28.12 | 0 | 11.03 |
Ficus sp. | PI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 4.34 | 0 | 1.65 |
Lamiaceae sp. | NC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.21 |
Maclura tinctoria (L.) D. Donex Steud.* | PI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.21 |
Marlierea excoriata Mart. | PI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.20 |
Piper amalago L.* | IS | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.20 |
Prockia crucis P. Browne ex L. | PI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.20 |
Psidium guineense Sw. | PI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.21 |
Averrhoidium gardnerianum Baill. | NC | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0.599 | 0 | 1.01 | 0 | 0.21 | 0 | 0.60 |
Sideroxylon obtusifolium (Roem & Schutt) Penn. | IS | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.20 |
Tocoyena formosa (Cham. &Schltdl.) K. Schum. | PI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.20 |
Xylopia frutescens Aubl. | IS | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.400 | 0 | 1.01 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.51 |
Zanthoxylum unifoliolatum Groppo & Pirani * | IS | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.100 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0.06 | 0 | 0.22 |
The Shannon-Wiener diversity index for the total area was low (H’= 3.35 nats/individual) and the general equitability was J = 0.74. It should be noted that the values between the analyzed areas showed a significant difference for H’ (t = -11.587; p < 0.01), with the highest diversity value for the forest area (forest = 3.47, eucalypt = 2.84). Equitability was also higher in the forest area (forest = 0.83; eucalypt = 0.69).
The species presented a different abundance among the compared areas. The following species were observed in the Forest area: Allophylus edulis (n = 72), Chomelia obtusa (n = 68), Cupania impressinervia (n = 59) and Myrcia splendens (n = 48). More individuals of the following species were recorded in the sub-forest of eucalypt: Genipa americana (n = 189), A. edulis (n = 122), Tapirira guianensis (n = 121) and C. obtusa (n = 111) (Fig.
Of the 60 woody species that settled in the sub-forest of the eucalyptus area, 19 did not occur in the forest area. In addition to the formation of two distinct groups (Fig.
The analysis of the ecological groups by individual between the areas showed a predominance of initial secondary individuals (ES: 422 ind.; PI: 283 ind.; LS: 96 ind.) in the forest area, while the regenerating area (eucalypt) had a predominance of pioneers (PI: 706 ind.; ES: 238 ind.; LS: 25 ind.) (Table
The total basal area is 21.19 m2/ha, and the results are similar when individualized between the analyzed areas (forest = 9.34 m2/ha; eucalypt = 11.85 m2/ha). It should be noted that the basal area value of the eucalyptus area is influenced by the high DBH value of Corymbia citriodora. In the same analysis performed without the presence of C. citriodora, the eucalypt forest presents a total basal area of 8.01 m2/ha. The statistical analysis performed without the presence of C. citriodora revealed no significant differences (t = 0.32; p > 0.05) between the areas.
The species with the highest relative densities in the forest area were A. edulis (8.76 ind./ha), C. obtusa (8.28 ind./ha) and C. impressinervia (7.18 ind./ha). In the area of eucalypt, G. americana (18.8 ind./ha), A. edulis (12.28 ind./ha) and T. guianensis (12.8 ind./ha) showed the highest relative densities.
As for relative dominance, the forest values appear in the following order: Tapirira guianensis (14.63 m2/ha), Byrsonima sericea (11.53 m2/ha) and Allophylus edulis (9.42 m2/ha). In the area of eucalypt, the most important species for dominance were Corymbia citriodora (32.36 m2/ha), G. americana (10.13 m2/ha) and Tapirira guianensis (6.96 m2/ha) e B. sericea (6.91 m2/ha) (Fig.
For the results of the importance value, a small variation was found between species in the two areas analyzed, the important forest (VI) species included A. edulis (6.99%), T. guianensis (6.61%), B. sericea (6.41%) and Cupania impressinervia (5.11%). The important species in the eucalyptus area included C. citriodora (11.09%), G. americana (10.92%), T. guianensis (7.56%) and A. edulis (7.39%) (Table
The eight species with the highest importance value in the forest area represent 41% of the total VI by species and 44% of the total of individuals for this area. For the eucalyptus area, the eight species accounted for 58% of the total VI per species and 68% of the total for this area. Corymbia citriodora had lower abundance in the eucalyptus area but were among the most important species.
The heights within the plots varied between 1.30 and 18.0 meters, with the majority of individuals presenting between 4 and 9 m in height. The eucalyptus area presented the majority of individuals between 4 and 6 m, although it was similar to the forest area in the other height classes (Fig.
The highest abundance observed for the eucalyptus area resulted from the presence of many young regenerating individuals and/or those of low diameter values. Some of these fine individuals belong to pioneer species, typically found in areas under regeneration, presenting rapid growth and low longevity, which justifies their high abundance in the eucalyptus area, subsidizing the observed difference between areas (
The eucalyptus area presented lower species richness compared to other areas of natural remnants (
The overall value of the Shannon-Wiener index for the Ibura FLONA was considered low. For the Atlantic Forest, values are commonly found between 3.16 and 4.29 nats/individuals, as reviewed by
At least two of the four families with the highest specific richness in this study were also predominant, sometimes reversing the order of importance, in phytosociological studies carried out in other fragments or ecosystems associated with the Sergipe Forest Atlantic (e.g.,
From the analysis of the ecological groups, it was observed that the Ibura FLONA has not yet reached the climax stage, mainly the eucalyptus area, represented in great part by pioneer individuals. In turn, the forest area, even presenting a more advanced age and structure, is not yet characterized by mature vegetation. A high prevalence of pioneer individuals was also observed by
The characterization of the eucalyptus area at a more initial successional stage than the forest area indicates that the successional processes in the 35 year period are insufficient for the Atlantic Forest areas to reach the climax stage. The evolution of these processes is dependent on internal factors (reproductive rate, colonization, competitive success) and external factors (distance between fragment, dispersion between area, low anthropic pressure) (
The estimated total basal area value for the Ibura FLONA was considered intermediate when compared to some studies carried out for areas of Atlantic Forest of Sergipe and Northeastern Brazil (ranging from 12.06 to 44.40 m2/ha;
In turn, low density species should have limitations for their population growth. It is possible that the selective cut in the area to groups of species considered rare may also limit the population growth of some species. In addition, environmental characteristics that are subject to different types of tensors should be considered as an influence to the structural development of forests and the colonization of species in deforested areas (
The species of highest value of importance (IVI) in the forest area are still the most important in relation to the other phytosociological indexes of this study, mainly the values of density and relative dominance. The Chomelia obtusa showed high values of density and frequency, but with low dominance, showing the high colonization capacity and making it a good local competitor. The presence of C. obtusa in open sites and tracks in the Ibura FLONA may indicate that individuals of this species prefer to colonize areas of high luminosity. This fact may explain the higher abundance value for the eucalyptus area.
Several approaches suggest the use of eucalypt species (Eucalyptus spp. and Corymbia citriodora) for the recovery of forest areas (
Finally, it was concluded that the period of 35 years was not sufficient for the recovery of the abandoned area with established planting of eucalyptus. But the eucalyptus plantation favored the arrival of the most common species in the forest area, while many species considered to be rare, as well as late secondary successional species were limited to this forest area. We recommend caution and planning in the use of this exotic homogeneous species. Priority should be given to the planting of native species with high colonization capacity in the recovery of degraded areas.
We thank CNPq for financial support to the first author throughout the research period. E.V.S.O. was supported by CAPES/FAPITEC (#88881.157451/2017-01). We also thank the whole team and employees of the Ibura National Forest, particularly the former manager Ana Carolina Gomes Batista. Our appreciation also goes to the laboratory colleagues of the ASE Herbarium and Conservation Laboratory of the Federal University of Sergipe.