Research Article |
Corresponding author: Mirian Roxana Calderon ( mrc_cali@yahoo.com.ar ) Academic editor: Ana Maria Leal-Zanchet
© 2019 Romina Paola Nievas, Mirian Roxana Calderon, Marta Matilde Moglia.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Nievas RP, Calderon MR, Moglia MM (2019) Environmental factors affecting the success of exotic plant invasion in a wildland-urban ecotone in temperate South America. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 14(2): 257-274. https://doi.org/10.3897/neotropical.14.e37633
|
Urbanization is one of the main causes driving changes in biodiversity patterns and it is regarded as a major threat to native biota. Successful exotic plant invasion depends on invasiveness and invasibility. Invasiveness is related to the characteristics of exotic plants and invasibility to the features of the sites. The objective of this study was to identify the invasibility environmental factors affecting the success of exotic plant invasion in a wildland-urban ecotone of the central region of Argentina (Potrero de los Funes Village, San Luis). Fifty phytosociological inventories were recorded in an area of 700 ha during spring and summer seasons (2013–2015). Abundance-coverage values of plants and environmental variables such as soil characteristics, anthropogenic disturbance, and altitude of the sites were assessed. Soil moisture, electrical conductivity (EC), acidity (pH), organic matter content, and nitrates were determined as part of the soil analysis. A Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling analysis was used to identify the possible relationship between abundance-coverage of the vegetation and environmental variables. Abundance-coverage of exotic plants was positively influenced by anthropogenic disturbance and nitrate levels, and negatively affected by altitude. However, no significant correlation was found between percentage of exotic plants and pH, EC, or soil moisture. Thus, urbanization and touristic activities influenced the success of exotic plant invasion.
A urbanização é uma das principais causas das mudanças nos padrões de biodiversidade sendo considerada uma grande ameaça à biota nativa. O sucesso exitoso da invasão das plantas exóticas depende da invasividade e invasibilidade. A invasividade está relacionada com às características das plantas exóticas e à invasibilidade com às características dos locais. O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar os fatores ambientais de invasibilidade que afetam o sucesso da invasão das plantas exóticas em ecótono urbano-silvestre na região central da Argentina (Potrero de los Funes, San Luis). Cinquenta inventários fitossociológicos foram registrados em uma área de 700 ha durante as estações primavera e verão (2013–2015). Valores de cobertura-abundância das plantas e variáveis ambientais, como características do solo, perturbação antropogênica e altitude dos sítios foram avaliadas. A umidade do solo, condutividade elétrica, acidez (pH), conteúdo de matéria orgânica e nitratos foram determinados como parte da análise do solo. Uma análise de escalonamento multidimensional não-métrico foi utilizada para identificar a possível relação entre a cobertura de abundância da vegetação e as variáveis ambientais. A abundância-cobertura de plantas exóticas foi positivamente influenciada pelas perturbações antrópicas e os níveis de nitrato e negativamente afetada pela altitude. No entanto, nenhuma correlação significativa foi encontrada entre a porcentagem de plantas exóticas e pH, EC ou umidade do solo. Assim, a urbanização e atividades turísticas influenciaram o sucesso da invasão de plantas exóticas.
altitude, anthropogenic disturbance, invasibility, soil characteristics
altitude, características do solo, distúrbio antropogênico, invasibilidade
Successful exotic plant invasion depends on invasiveness and invasibility. Invasiveness is related to the characteristics or biological traits of exotic plants (
Several soil characteristics have been associated with plant invasion (
The province of San Luis, Argentina is characterized by a low industrial development in contrast with accelerated urban growth (
The objective of this study was to identify the invasibility environmental factors affecting the success of exotic plant invasion in a wildland-urban ecotone. We hypothesize that the abundance-coverage of exotic plants is positively influenced by high soil moisture, organic matter content, nitrate concentration, neutral pH, and anthropogenic disturbance. Even when these hypotheses have been broadly tested, mainly in Europe and other parts of the Northern Hemisphere, this is the first study performed in the biographic Chaco Serrano District. We also hypothesize that the abundance-coverage of exotic plants is negatively influenced by high electrical conductivity and altitude.
The village of Potrero de los Funes is located in the southwest portion of the Sierras de San Luis System in San Luis province, central region of Argentina (Fig.
An anthropogenic disturbance index was used to evaluate the level of anthropogenic disturbance of each site (
The 23 anthropogenic disturbance factors assessed in order to estimate the degree of human disturbance surrounding each site in Potrero de los Funes, San Luis province, central region of Argentina.
Anthropogenic disturbance index | |
---|---|
Cattle faeces | Water extraction pipes |
Stray animals, breeding centres | Mining activity |
Overgrazing | Dams, reservoirs |
Agricultural areas | Channelization |
Clearing, wood extraction | Stormwater/sewer drainage pipes |
Construction debris | Diverted channels |
Soil Erosion | Isolated channels |
Density of houses | Presence of gabions |
Proximity to city/town | Bridges |
Human trails and gravel/dirt roads | Landfill, urban solid waste disposal areas |
Paved roads | Others |
Constructions for recreational purposes | |
Evidence of fires |
Four soil samples were taken from the root zone with a 6 cm diameter cylinder and within the 10–30 cm in depth in each plot. Measured soil parameters included gravimetric moisture, electrical conductivity (EC) and pH, evaluated in 1:5 (by weight) soil-water extract using an EC meter and pH meter, respectively. Organic matter was determined through the Walkley and Black’s method and nitrates were evaluated by chromotropic acid method (
Satellite images were used to identify homogenous vegetation areas and the number of plots needed to perform a representative vegetation survey of the study area (700 ha). Fifty plots were established at random. Plot size was determined for each vegetation type using the minimal area method, meaning that the plot had to be large enough to represent community composition (
Two data matrices representing environmental variables and vegetation abundance-coverage were constructed and the PC-ORD 5.0 software package was used for multivariate statistical analysis (Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling; NMDS) (
The anthropogenic disturbance index varied among plots from values below 10 for the most preserved plots (ESPIN, MOLLE, CORTA) to values close to 20 for the most disturbed plots (CYNO, CARDA, CARDALCA). The altitude of the sites ranged from 911 m a.s.l. (CYNO1) to 1099 m a.s.l. (SOPHO11). Soil chemical characteristics also varied among plots, mainly in the nitrate content (Table
Anthropogenic Disturbance Index values, altitude and soil chemical parameters (average ± standard error) at the plots in Potrero de los Funes, San Luis province, central region of Argentina.
Plot ID | Anthropogenic disturbance index | Altitude (m a.s.l.) | Soil moisture (%) | EC (mS·cm–1) | pH | Organic matter (%) | Nitrates (ppm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPIN1 | 7 | 979 | 2.20±0.002 | 0.6±0.12 | 6.95±0.06 | 0.7±0.02 | 13.8±0.25 |
ESPIN2 | 8 | 997 | 2.20±0.0015 | 0.6±0.1 | 6.95±0.07 | 0.7±0.03 | 12.2±0.28 |
ESPIN3 | 8 | 920 | 0.80±0.002 | 1.35±0.13 | 7.97±0.1 | 0.45±0.01 | 13±0.31 |
ESPIN4 | 7 | 1009 | 2.20±0.03 | 0.6±0.12 | 6.95±0.05 | 0.7±0.02 | 13.2±0.45 |
ESPIN5 | 7 | 978 | 2.20±0.03 | 0.6±0.1 | 6.95±0.1 | 0.7±0.032 | 13.3±0.19 |
ESPIN6 | 8 | 980 | 2.54±0.002 | 0.22±0.1 | 7.42±0.07 | 0.81±0.01 | 12±0.18 |
ESPIN7 | 6 | 998 | 1.61±0.0041 | 0.23±0.1 | 5.47±0.07 | 0.81±0.02 | 12.6±0.27 |
ESPIN8 | 9 | 999 | 2.20±0.002 | 0.6±0.12 | 6.95±0.1 | 0.7±0.025 | 11±0.21 |
BC2 | 11 | 967 | 17.16±0.01 | 0.53±0.08 | 6.54±0.1 | 1.18±0.01 | 31±0.8 |
BC1 | 11 | 968 | 17.20±0.01 | 0.54±0.07 | 6.44±0.1 | 1.2±0.01 | 28±0.7 |
CHILFLO1 | 12 | 962 | 8.55±0.02 | 0.7±0.07 | 5.57±0.06 | 1.2±0.005 | 13.5±0.31 |
CHILFLO2 | 10 | 992 | 8.55±0.04 | 0.6±0.05 | 5.5±0.05 | 1.21±0.01 | 9±0.2 |
CHILFLO3 | 12 | 969 | 2.70±0.03 | 0.69±0.07 | 5.7±0.05 | 1.19±0.01 | 12±0.3 |
CHILFLO4 | 11 | 994 | 8.55±0.04 | 0.65±0.05 | 5.6±0.06 | 1.22±0.01 | 10.2±0.27 |
CORTA1 | 9 | 988 | 22.03±1.2 | 0.27±0.03 | 6.96±0.1 | 0.25±0.003 | 7.7±0.13 |
CORTA2 | 9 | 973 | 28.1±1.3 | 0.26±0.05 | 7±0.06 | 0.21±0.004 | 3.1±0.08 |
CORTA3 | 8 | 991 | 25.04±1.2 | 0.25±0.05 | 6.8±0.07 | 0.23±0.002 | 5.6±0.15 |
CORTA4 | 9 | 958 | 20.02±1.3 | 0.28±0.06 | 6.78±0.07 | 0.2±0.006 | 6.2±0.17 |
CORTA5 | 8 | 943 | 20.08±1.5 | 0.24±0.05 | 6.96±0.06 | 0.27±0.003 | 7±0.17 |
HETSAL1 | 9 | 968 | 5.9±0.1 | 0.3±0.05 | 7.61±0.1 | 1.1±0.002 | 28±0.89 |
HETSAL2 | 10 | 990 | 9.92±0.4 | 0.13±0.04 | 6.81±0.03 | 0.72±0.002 | 23±0.7 |
HETSAL3 | 10 | 963 | 4.1±0.3 | 0.28±0.05 | 8.71±0.05 | 0.31±0.002 | 26±0.65 |
HETSAL4 | 9 | 984 | 10.00±0.5 | 0.13±0.02 | 6.81±0.07 | 0.72±0.003 | 24.5±0.72 |
HETSAL5 | 10 | 964 | 10.02±0.4 | 0.14±0.01 | 7±0.07 | 0.71±0.005 | 28.2±0.68 |
HETSAL6 | 9 | 961 | 0.65±0.02 | 0.13±0.02 | 6.81±0.08 | 0.72±0.005 | 28.1±0.73 |
CARDA3 | 17 | 970 | 15.14±0.6 | 0.42±0.01 | 7.05±0.05 | 1.03±0.01 | 11.5±0.35 |
CARDA2 | 18 | 1039 | 15.14±0.7 | 0.48±0.02 | 6.95±0.1 | 1.05±0.01 | 13±0.25 |
CARDA1 | 18 | 1039 | 15.50±0.5 | 0.42±0.02 | 6.87±0.06 | 1.04±0.013 | 25±0.9 |
CARDALCA | 20 | 964 | 15.16±0.4 | 0.41±0.01 | 7.01±0.07 | 1.03±0.015 | 22±0.61 |
CYNO1 | 17 | 911 | 0.8±0.003 | 1.35±0.06 | 7.97±0.1 | 0.45±0.03 | 31.5±0.82 |
CYNO2 | 18 | 955 | 4.1±0.05 | 0.28±0.01 | 8.71±0.13 | 0.31±0.02 | 28.8±0.75 |
CYNO3 | 18 | 976 | 10.00±0.5 | 0.25±0.01 | 7.96±0.15 | 0.44±0.02 | 32±0.65 |
CYNO4 | 19 | 984 | 9.95±0.5 | 0.23±0.02 | 7.89±0.11 | 0.49±0.03 | 30±0.77 |
CYNO5 | 18 | 963 | 9.00±0.4 | 0.25±0.01 | 8±0.1 | 0.47±0.02 | 29±0.91 |
MOLLE1 | 6 | 1028 | 3.30±0.2 | 0.14±0.01 | 6.87±0.09 | 0.26±0.01 | 14.8±0.4 |
MOLLE4 | 6 | 1083 | 3.19±0.3 | 0.28±0.01 | 6.29±0.07 | 0.64±0.02 | 39.1±0.7 |
MOLLE3 | 5 | 998 | 3.24±0.17 | 0.2±0.01 | 6.5±0.06 | 0.50±0.02 | 15±0.5 |
MOLLE2 | 6 | 971 | 3.20±0.2 | 0.28±0.02 | 6.29±0.06 | 0.64±0.023 | 13±0.45 |
TAGBID1 | 9 | 975 | 14.50±0.7 | 0.17±0.01 | 7.77±0.05 | 0.89±0.02 | 15.6±0.65 |
TEGBID2 | 8 | 962 | 13.60±0.5 | 0.25±0.01 | 7.96±0.07 | 0.44±0.02 | 12±0.51 |
TEGBID3 | 8 | 1099 | 25.00±0.8 | 0.21±0.01 | 7.66±0.05 | 0.5±0.022 | 22.5±0.48 |
TEGBID4 | 9 | 965 | 25.66±0.7 | 0.23±0.01 | 7.76±0.06 | 0.53±0.021 | 20±0.52 |
TEGBID5 | 8 | 991 | 15.66±1.2 | 0.21±0.02 | 7.69±0.07 | 0.52±0.03 | 15±0.56 |
SOPHO8 | 4 | 970 | 10.56±0.8 | 0.17±0.02 | 6.99±0.05 | 0.98±0.01 | 12.65±0.36 |
SOPHO11 | 5 | 1011 | 11.00±0.62 | 0.15±0.01 | 7.1±0.08 | 0.96±0.02 | 12±0.37 |
POLYXAN1 | 12 | 959 | 16.12±0.6 | 0.083±0.001 | 5.55±0.08 | 1.11±0.016 | 13.5 6±0.4 |
POLYXAN2 | 11 | 965 | 5.65±0.34 | 0.093±0.002 | 5.65±0.07 | 1.21±0.01 | 15±0.38 |
HETERO1 | 10 | 964 | 7.29±0.41 | 0.4±0.01 | 6.95±0.09 | 1.02±0.01 | 15.6±0.41 |
HETERO2 | 9 | 948 | 7.70±0.5 | 0.42±0.02 | 7.09±0.05 | 1.12±0.01 | 22.3±0.6 |
HETERO3 | 12 | 954 | 7.50±0.3 | 0.44±0.01 | 6.98±0.07 | 1.52±0.016 | 25.6±0.7 |
Fifty phytosociological inventories were performed at the area of study (see Suppl. material
Species list of 105 taxa registered during the phytosociological inventories performed in Potrero de los Funes, San Luis province, central region of Argentina, from 2013–2015. Exotic species are indicated in bold.
Species | Code | Species | Code |
---|---|---|---|
Abutilon grandifolium (Willd.) Sweet | abugra | Jodina rhombifolia (Hook. & Arn.) Reissek | jodrho |
Acalypha poiretii Spreng. | acapoi | Justicia tweediana (Nees) Griseb. | justwe |
Acanthostyles buniifolius (Hook. & Arn.) R.M. King & H. Rob. | acabun | Lantana grisebachii Stuck. ex Seckt | langri |
Aloysia gratissima var. gratissima | alogra | Leptochloa crinita (Lag.) P.M. Peterson & N.W. Snow | lepcri |
Amelichloa brachychaeta (Godr.) Arriaga & Barkworth | amebra | Lippia junelliana (Moldenke) Tronc. | lipjun |
Anemia tomentosa (Savigny) Sw. | anetom | Lithraea molleoides (Vell.) Engl. | litmol |
Baccharis artemisioides Hook. & Arn. | bacart | Lorentzianthus viscidus (Hook. & Arn.) R.M. King & H. Rob. | lorvis |
Baccharis flabellata Hook. & Arn. | bacfla | Malvastrum sp. | malvas |
Baccharis salicifolia (Ruiz & Pav.) Pers. | bacsal | Medicago lupulina L. | medlup |
Baccharis sp. | rombac | Melica macra Nees | melmac |
Baccharis ulicina Hook. & Arn. | baculi | Melilotus albus Desr. | melalb |
Bassia scoparia (L.) A.J. Scott | bassco | Morus alba L. | moralb |
Bidens pilosa L. | bidpil | Nassella tenuissima (Trin.) Barkworth | nasten |
Bidens subalternans DC. | bidsub | Oenothera curtiflora W.L. Wagner & Hoch | gaupar |
Bothriochloa springfieldii (Gould) Parodi. | botspr | Oxalis conorrhiza Jacq. | oxacon |
Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr. | boucur | Pappophorum sp. | paposp |
Bowlesia incana Ruiz & Pav. | bowinc | Paspalum dilatatum Poir. | pasdil |
Bromus catharticus Vahl | brocru | Plantago major L. | plamaj |
Carduus acanthoides L. | caraca | Poa annua L. | poacsp |
Carduus thoermeri Weinm. | cartho | Polygonum persicaria L. | polper |
Celtis tala Gillies ex Planch. | celehr | Porlieria microphylla (Baill.) Descole, O´Donell & Lourteig | pormic |
Cestrum parqui L’Hér. | cespar | Prosopis caldenia Burkart | procal |
Chaptalia sp. | chapsp | Prosopis nigra (Griseb.) Hieron. | pronig |
Cheilanthes buchtienii (Rosenst.) R.M. Tryon | chebuc | Prunella vulgaris L. | pruvul |
Chenopodium album L. | chealb | Rhodoscirpus asper (J. Presl & C. Presl) Léveillé-Bourret, Donadío & J.R. Starr | rhoasp |
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. | cirvul | Rosa rubiginosa L. | rosrub |
Clematis montevidensis Spreng. | clemon | Schinus fasciculatus (Griseb.) I.M. | schfas |
Colletia spinosissima J.F. Gmel. | colspi | Schizachyrium plumigerum (Ekman) Parodi | schplu |
Commelina erecta L. | comere | Senna subulata (Griseb.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby | sensub |
Condalia microphylla Cav. | conmic | Setaria lachnea (Nees) Kunth | setlac |
Cortaderia selloana (Schult. & Schult. f.) Asch. & Graebn. | corsel | Setaria parviflora (Poir.) Kerguélen | setpar |
Cosmos sulphureus Cav. | cossul | Sida spinosa L. | sidspi |
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. | cyndac | Solanum elaeagnifolium Cav. | solela |
Descurainia erodiifolia (Phil.) Prantl ex Reiche | desero | Sonchus asper (L.) Hill | sonasp |
Dichondra microcalyx (Hallier f.) Fabris | dicmic | Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. | sorhal |
Eryngium horridum Malme | eryhor | Sophora linearifolia Griseb. | soplin |
Euphorbia dentata Michx. | eupden | Symphyotrichum squamatum (Spreng.) G.L. Nesom | symsqu |
Eustachys retusa (Lag.) Kunth | eusret | Tagetes minuta L. | tagmin |
Evolvulus arizonicus A. Gray | evoari | Taraxacum officinale F.H. Wigg. | taroff |
Evolvulus sericeus Sw. | evoser | Tarenaya aculeata (L.) Soares Neto & Roalson | cleacu |
Flourensia thurifera (Molina) DC. | floool | Tessaria absinthioides (Hook. & Arn.) DC. | tesabs |
Galium richardianum (Gillies ex Hook. & Arn.) Endl. ex Walp | galric | Trifolium repens L. | trirep |
Galinsoga parviflora Cav. | galpar | Typha domingensis Pers. | typdom |
Geoffroea decorticans (Gillies ex Hook. & Arn.) Burkart | geodec | Ulmus sp. | ulmusp |
Glandularia sp. | glalil | Urtica circularis (Hicken) Sorarú | urtcir |
Heimia salicifolia (Kunth) Link | heisal | Vachellia astringens (Gillies ex Hook. & Arn.) Speg. | vacast |
Heterosperma ovatifolium Cav. | hetova | Vachellia caven (Molina) Seigler & Ebinger | vaccav |
Heterotheca subaxillaris (Lam.) Britton & Rusby | hetsub | Viola metajaponica Nakai | viomet |
Hydrocotyle bonariensis Lam. | hydbon | Viola odorata L. | vioodo |
Iresine diffusa Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd | iredif | Xanthium strumarium L. | xanstr |
Ipomoea rubriflora O’Donell | iporub | Xanthium spinosum L. | xanspi |
Jarava pseudoichu (Caro) F. Rojas | jarpse | Zinnia peruviana (L.) L. | zinper |
Jarava ichu Ruiz & Pav. | jarich |
The percentage of exotic plants species within the plots varied from 0% in the most preserved sites (ESPIN, SOPHO, CHILFLO) to 70% in the most disturbed sites (CARDA, CARDALCA). The abundance-coverage of exotic species also varied among plots with some dominated by exotics (CARDA, CYNO, HETERO). The minimum stress of the three axes in the NMDS ordination was 17.9. As part of the NMDS analysis, the Monte Carlo test showed a p = 0.004 and the instability was 0.00386 in 500 iterations. The first three ordination axes explained a cumulative 60% of variance in the dataset. The ordination final diagram showed that the pattern of distribution of exotic plants was positively related with anthropogenic disturbance, nitrate, soil moisture, and pH, and it was negatively related with altitude. The ordination diagram separated plots according to these environmental variables (Fig.
Plot ordination of non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on the abundance-coverage data of plant species in Potrero de los Funes Village, San Luis province, central region of Argentina. Black dots represent the plots and the vectors the environmental variables related to NMDS axes (cutoff level r2 = 0.22). The names of the plots are determined by the dominant species within the plot: ESPIN (“espinillares”of Vachellia caven), CHILFLO (“chilcales” of Flourensia thurifera), MOLLE (“mollares” of Lithraea molleoides), SOPHO (“soforales” of Sophora linearifolia), HETSAL (Heterosperma ovatifolium and Salpichroa origanifolia,), TAGBIB (Tagetes minuta and Bidens subalternans), CYNO (Cynodon dactylon), CORTA (Cortaderia selloana), CARDA and CARDALCA (“cardales” of Cirsium vulgare), BC (Prosopis caldenia), HETERO (“alcanforales” of Heterotheca subaxillaris).
The following species were associated with axis 1: Vachellia caven (r = –0.630), Cirsium vulgare (r = 0.491), Medicago lupulina (r = 0.472), Bouteloua curtipendula (r = –0.459), and Flourensia thurifera (r = –0.416). The species associated with axis two were: Xanthium spinosum (r = –0.572), Polygonum persicaria (r = –0.570), Xanthium strumarium (r = –0.535), Chenopodium album (r = –0.499), Bidens subalternans (r = 0.448), and Tagetes minuta (r = 0.419). The species that were associated with axis three were: Heterosperma ovatifolia (r = 0.607), Cynodon dactylon (r = 0.541), Salpichroa origanifolia (r = 0.521), and Cortaderia selloana (r = –0.519) (Fig.
Species ordination of non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot based on abundance-coverage data. Black dots represent the species and vectors of the environmental variables related to NMDS axes (cutoff level r2 = 0.22). All 105 species were included in NMDS, but for clarity only the 16 most abundant species were plotted on the ordination final diagram.
The plant communities related with higher altitudes were the ones dominated by “mollares” of Lithraea molleoides, ”espinillares” of Vachellia caven, “chilcales” of Flourensia thurifera, and “soforales” of Sophora linearifolia. These plant communities were the most conserved and with the lowest percentages of exotic plants. These communities include the mature forest communities (“mollares”) and their regressive succession stages: “espinillares” of Vachellia caven, “chilcales” of Flourensia thurifera, and “soforales” of Sophora linearifolia.
Exotic plant communities dominated by Heterotheca subaxillaris (“alcanforales”) and Cirsium vulgare (“cardales”) were found at lower altitudes, with high concentrations of nitrate and high percentages of soil moisture. Medicago lupulina, Cirsium vulgare, Cynodon dactylon, Chenopodium album, and Xanthium spinosum were exotic species common in disturbed and nitrogen-enriched sites together with native species such as Salpichroa origanifolia, Heterosperma ovatifolium, and Oxalis conorrhiza.
Spearman’s correlation test confirmed that anthropogenic disturbance was the variable most strongly correlated with the percentage of exotic plants (r = 0.600; p < 0.00004) followed by a moderate correlation with nitrate concentration on soil (r = 0.500; p < 0.01) and a negative correlation with altitude (r = –0.400; p < 0.01). No significant correlation was found between percentage of exotic plants and pH, EC, or soil moisture (p > 0.01).
In accordance with the hypothesis established in this investigation, a strong positive relationship between anthropogenic disturbance and abundance-coverage of exotic plants was found. Many researchers have arrived at similar conclusions and reported that anthropogenic disturbance is a key factor in invasion success (
In the last three decades, the area of study has experienced an increase in population growth, urbanization, and tourism influx that may explain the success of invasion reflected in our results. Most of the exotic plants found in the area of study were intentionally introduced as ornamentals and for landscaping purposes around houses, camping areas and recreational establishments. Additionally, unintentional human-mediated dispersal through contaminated footwear and clothes along hiking trails within the area may contribute to the expansion of the exotic plant distribution (
A positive relationship between nitrate concentration in soil and patterns in vegetation distribution was found. Spearman’s correlation test showed a significant relationship between nitrogen and the percentage of exotic plants, and hence available soil nitrogen in the area was an important soil characteristic related with the invasibility of the species found. Nitrogen availability is known to be important in limiting the primary production in terrestrial ecosystems (
A negative relationship was found between abundance-coverage of exotic species with altitude, which was consistent with observations from other investigations (
Through the NMDS analysis, it was possible to identify a weak relationship between the pattern of vegetation distribution and soil moisture. Additionally, no significant correlation was found when the Spearman correlation test was applied. Although the presence and abundance of invasive plants is usually favored by the increase of soil moisture (
A weakly positive correlation between pH and the pattern of vegetation distribution was found. Though plant communities with a high proportion of invasive species are usually distributed on acidic soils, which have greater availability of nitrates (
No correlation between organic matter and exotic plants was observed in this study.
Anthropogenic disturbance, nitrate concentration, and altitude were the most important factors influencing the success of exotic plant invasion in Potrero de los Funes. This study provides the first insight regarding the relationships between exotic plant success and site characteristics in a natural-urban gradient ecosystem of the central area of Argentina.
We gratefully acknowledge Instituto de Química de San Luis “Dr. Roberto Olsina” – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (INQUISAL-CONICET) and Universidad Nacional de San Luis (Project PROICO 2-1914 and PROICO 3-0716) for financial support. We thank Rebecca Meissner and Robert Coville for the valuable language and grammar revision of the manuscript. Finally, we would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped to improve the quality of this manuscript.
Phytosociological inventories performed in Potrero de los Funes from 2013-2015
Data type: measurement