Corrigendum
Print
Corrigendum
Corrigendum: Witt PBR, Faria HH, Oliveira J, Oliveira LR (2023) Management effectiveness of Nature Conservation Units in southern Brazil. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 18(3): 209–230. doi: 10.3897/neotropical.18.e103019
expand article infoPatrícia Bernardes Rodrigues Witt‡§, Helder Henrique de Faria|, Juliano de Oliveira‡, Larissa Rosa de Oliveira‡
‡ Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, Brazil
§ Divisão de Pesquisa e Manutenção de Coleções Cientificas, Departamento de Biodiversidade, Secretaria Estadual do Meio Ambiente e Infraestrutura do RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais, São Paulo, Brazil
¶ Grupo de Estudos de Mamíferos Aquáticos do Rio Grande do Sul, Torres, Brazil

Corresponding author: Patrícia Bernardes Rodrigues Witt ( patriciawittbiologa@gmail.com )

Academic editor: Piter Boll
© 2023 Patrícia Bernardes Rodrigues Witt, Helder Henrique de Faria, Juliano de Oliveira, Larissa Rosa de Oliveira.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Witt PBR, Faria HH, Oliveira J, Oliveira LR (2023) Corrigendum: Witt PBR, Faria HH, Oliveira J, Oliveira LR (2023) Management effectiveness of Nature Conservation Units in southern Brazil. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 18(3): 209–230. doi: 10.3897/neotropical.18.e103019. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 18(4): 259-260. https://doi.org/10.3897/neotropical.18.e113743
ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9FCC0098-558D-41A3-8E27-98D92544E26B
Open Access

After the publication of our recent article (Witt et al. 2023), we noticed that the distribution map of the conservation units in that study (Fig. 1 on page 214) had an error in its caption. The caption should read:

Figure 1. Distribution by Biome of the 11 Conservation Units (CUs) surveyed in Rio Grande do Sul State, Southern Brazil. 1. Espinilho State Park; 2. Turvo State Park; 3. Espigão Alto State Park; 4. Ibitiriá State Park; 5. Tainhas State Park; 6. Aratinga Ecologial Station; 7. Serra Geral State Park; 8. Itapeva State Park; 9. Banhado dos Pachecos Wildlife Refuge; 10. Delta do Jacuí State Park; 11. Itapuã State Park.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

No funding was reported.

Author contributions

All authors have contributed equally.

Author ORCIDs

Patrícia Bernardes Rodrigues Witt https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-5968

Juliano de Oliveira https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2834-852X

Larissa Rosa de Oliveira https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-3697

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Witt PBR, Faria HH, Oliveira J, Oliveira LR (2023) Management effectiveness of Nature Conservation Units in southern Brazil. In: Boll P, Lehmann AP, Allgayer H, Krüger L (Eds) Diversity and Wildlife Management: The legacy of PPG Biologia Unisinos. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 18(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.3897/neotropical.18.e103019.suppl2
login to comment